If you have privileges at a hospital, those privileges can be limited, or taken away completely, for certain conduct and infractions. The law, however, requires that the hospital first provide a fair hearing process, known as peer review. Hospital peer review proceedings can threaten not only a physician’s clinical privileges, but also his or her professional reputation and future career, as adverse actions affecting a physician's privileges are reported to the National Practitioner Databank (NPDB).
We represent physicians in all aspects of hospital peer review, medical staff investigations, and credentialing disputes. Our experienced healthcare attorneys guide clients through medical executive committee reviews, focused professional practice evaluations (FPPE), corrective action hearings, and appeals—ensuring that hospitals follow their own bylaws, federal requirements, and Due Process protections. We work to protect physicians from undeserved discipline, reportable actions, and career-altering outcomes while preserving their ability to practice medicine.
If a physician resigns during the pendency of a peer review investigation, or agrees to temporarily surrender privileges for more than 30 days, these events must typically be reported to the National Practitioner Databank (NPDB).
Copyright © 2026 Grubman Warner Berry LLP - All Rights Reserved.
Nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. Nor does accessing the material on this site create an attorney-client relationship. Descriptions of prior matters are used as examples only and should not be read to guarantee an outcome in any future case.